Invisible Man (2020): Who's The Real Villain?

Hey guys! Ever watched a movie that just messes with your head, making you question everything you thought you knew? That’s exactly what "The Invisible Man" (2020) does! This isn't your grandpa's invisible man story; it's a modern thriller that dives deep into themes of abuse, gaslighting, and technology gone wrong. But the biggest question on everyone’s mind after watching it is: Who really is the killer? Let’s break down the suspense, unravel the plot twists, and figure out who deserves the blame in this seriously gripping film.

Delving into the Plot of The Invisible Man (2020)

To figure out who the real killer is, first, we've gotta recap what actually happens in "The Invisible Man". The story centers around Cecilia Kass, a woman trapped in an abusive relationship with her brilliant but controlling partner, Adrian Griffin. Adrian, an optics genius, is wealthy and isolates Cecilia from her friends and family. Fearing for her life, Cecilia escapes in the dead of night. Just when she begins to breathe again, she learns that Adrian has apparently committed suicide, leaving her a substantial inheritance.

However, Cecilia suspects that Adrian isn't really dead. Strange things begin to happen. Objects move on their own, she feels watched, and unsettling events plague her life and the lives of those around her. She starts to believe that Adrian has found a way to make himself invisible and is tormenting her. Her sanity is questioned by everyone around her, and she struggles to prove that she's not crazy and that Adrian is, in fact, still alive and enacting a twisted form of revenge. The tension mounts as Cecilia fights to unmask the invisible man and reclaim her life, leading to a series of terrifying encounters and shocking revelations. So, with all this chaos, who is ultimately responsible for the mayhem?

Adrian Griffin: The Obvious Suspect

Let’s be real, Adrian Griffin is the prime suspect from the get-go. I mean, the guy is a master of optics and technology, and he has a history of controlling and abusive behavior. It’s pretty clear he's capable of some seriously messed up stuff. Throughout the movie, Adrian, whether visible or not, orchestrates a series of events designed to drive Cecilia insane and ruin her life. He isolates her, sabotages her relationships, and even frames her for violent acts.

But here’s where it gets complicated. The film does an excellent job of making us question everything. Is Adrian really the one behind it all, or is there a more complex explanation? Adrian's intelligence and resources make him fully capable of inventing an invisibility suit and using it to terrorize Cecilia. His controlling nature and history of abuse provide a clear motive. Even when it seems like someone else might be involved, the evidence always points back to Adrian. His actions are deliberate and calculated, aimed at breaking Cecilia's spirit and maintaining control over her, even from beyond the grave (or so everyone thinks).

Tom Griffin: A Potential Accomplice?

Now, let’s talk about Tom Griffin, Adrian’s brother. He's a lawyer who appears to be helping Cecilia manage Adrian’s estate after his supposed death. But, there are hints that he might be more involved than he lets on. Is he just a concerned brother, or is he complicit in Adrian’s schemes? Tom's role in the film is ambiguous, making him a suspect in enabling Adrian’s actions. He certainly benefits from maintaining the illusion of Adrian's death. Could he be helping Adrian by covering his tracks or even participating directly in the torment?

Some theories suggest that Tom might have known about Adrian's plans all along and helped him execute them. His calm demeanor and legal expertise could have been instrumental in keeping Adrian's activities hidden. The movie cleverly plants seeds of doubt, making us question Tom's true motives and his level of involvement in the sinister plot. While Adrian is the primary perpetrator, Tom's potential complicity adds another layer of complexity to the question of who the real killer is. Ultimately, the film leaves enough ambiguity to allow for different interpretations, but it's clear that Tom's character is far from innocent.

Cecilia Kass: A Killer or a Survivor?

Okay, this might sound crazy, but hear me out. Could Cecilia herself be considered a killer in this narrative? After all, she does take matters into her own hands in a pretty definitive way by the end of the movie. Throughout the film, Cecilia evolves from a victim to a resourceful and determined survivor. She faces unimaginable terror and gaslighting, pushing her to the brink of sanity. By the climax of the movie, she decides that she has to fight back.

In the end, Cecilia orchestrates a plan that leads to Adrian's death. She uses his own invisibility suit against him, turning the tables on her abuser. While her actions are born out of self-defense and a desperate need to protect herself, they do result in the death of another human being. So, the question becomes: Does that make her a killer? Or is she simply a survivor who did what she had to do to escape a horrifying situation? The film doesn't offer a simple answer, leaving it up to the audience to decide whether Cecilia's actions are justified. Her transformation from victim to victor is a powerful arc, but it also raises complex ethical questions about the nature of justice and revenge.

The Verdict: Who Is the Real Killer?

So, after all that, who do we pin the "killer" label on? Adrian Griffin is undeniably the primary antagonist and the architect of Cecilia's suffering. His actions, whether directly or indirectly, lead to the death and destruction that unfold throughout the film. He uses his intelligence and resources to manipulate and control Cecilia, driving her to the edge of madness. Even if Tom played a role, Adrian is the mastermind behind the terror.

However, "The Invisible Man" isn't just a straightforward thriller; it's a commentary on abuse and control. The film suggests that the true killer isn't just the one who commits the final act of violence, but also the one who inflicts emotional and psychological damage. Adrian's abuse is a form of violence, and his actions have far-reaching consequences. While Cecilia does kill Adrian in the end, it is an act of self-defense after enduring extensive torment. Ultimately, the film positions Adrian as the 'killer' due to his calculated and relentless campaign of terror against Cecilia, even if Cecilia is the one who ultimately ends his life. The movie really makes you think about the different forms that abuse can take and who is truly responsible for the damage it causes, right? Did this movie also mess with your head? Let me know your thoughts!